Revenge, Walsh style

I said I had a few tales from the appalling council meeting last Thursday, so here is the second one. This is about what happens to people when you cross Dick Walsh, eg by not voting with him when he tells you or, in this case, the worst sin of all: resigning from his administration.

Robert MacIntyre has been a councillor for Bute for many years and, since the 2012 election, he has been the chair of the Bute & Cowal Area Committee. Because Robert was unable to get the support from Walsh’s administration over his attempts to save the dementia unit in the council care home in Rothesay, he resigned from the administration a few weeks ago. Dick asked him if he had also resigned as the chair of the area committee, to which Robert said no.

Anyway, come Thursday last week Walsh produces a motion that, among other things, proposed sacking Robert and installing Alex McNaughton in his place. We met with the SNP Group during a break and we agreed we would try to strike out the part that sacked Robert. He’s a well respected chair of the committee and did not deserve to be sacked. After a rancoros debate it went to a vote. The position of chair attracts an extra payment of some £3k which would transfer to Alex McNaughton. I expected Alex to do the decent thing and not vote but he did. He voted to oust his long standing pal Robert, to take the £3k payment away from him and give it to himself.

On Friday I emailed the council’s monitoring officer Mr Hendry and today I saw the reply. Doing what Alex did is perfectly OK apparently and doesn’t break the code of conduct. My email of last week is pasted below for information. Not sure what you think but I find this astounding. We have a code of conduct that is used to try and silence councillors and the same code allows you to vote yourself a pay rise. Great stuff indeed.

Douglas, I’d appreciate your advice please following yesterday’s display of petty politics and political vendettas from the increasingly shameless council administration.

A motion was submitted by the administration for item 11a, which was carried. As you know, this motion (bullet point 4) removed Cllr Robert E MacIntyre as chair of the Bute & Cowal Area Committee to be replaced by Cllr Alex McNaughton. One  effect of this change is to remove an additional responsibility payment from Cllr MacIntyre and add that same additional payment to the salary of Cllr McNaughton. Can you please:

  1. Confirm the gross annual additional payment that will now be paid to Cllr McNaughton.
  2. Confirm that Cllr McNaughton voted with the motion.
  3. Give your view as to whether or not Cllr McNaughton should have declared a pecuniary interest in this matter.

I should make clear that I think this matter is distinctly different from a scenario when the administration appoints all its appointees to positions of responsibility within the council. This was the taking of a position from one and giving to another.  I accept that whether Cllr McNaughton took part or not might have made no difference to the outcome, but that actually suggests he might have shown more wisdom had he declared an interest and left the chamber.

I would appreciate your advice on this today please Douglas.

Thank you



  1. Walsh holds the Aces lol…If the position involves an increase in payment, you would think that general conflict of interest principles would seem to preclude voting for oneself for this position. Despite the fact that it may often happen that council members do vote for themselves, without adverse legal consequence, the safest course is not to vote for oneself to fill a vacancy.Below is the Summary of the Nolan Committee’s Third
    Report on Standards in Public Life

    The Seven Principles of Public Life
    “Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest. They should not
    do so in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or
    their friends.”

  2. Makes you want to puke. Am I correct in thinking that McNaughton was also one of the eighteen who voted against SCCDC getting CT. If so, that’ll be 50% of the Cowal and Dunoon councillors i.e., Walsh, McQueen and McNaughton who failed to try and reverse the declining opportunities for employment for both young and old in Dunoon and Cowal. Why anyone would seek to live here in Dunoon or Cowal with councillor representatives such as these three, beggars believe.

Leave a comment